Sample Review of the recognition of DBZ as invalid due to the statute of limitations on the bank's Claim
To the Taraz City Court of Zhambyl region
To the judge .............
Republic of Kazakhstan, 080007, Taraz, K.Turysova str. 7
.......@sud.kz
87262 34-75-50, 87262 34-75-43
from the Defendant: ........................
IIN: ......................
Representative by proxy:
Sarzhanov Galymzhan Turlybekovich
IIN: 850722301036.
Almaty, Medeu district,050002, Zhibek Zholy ave.,
50, office 202, Business center Block.
info@zakonpravo.kz / www.zakonpravo.kz
+ 7 (708) 578 57 58.
Feedback
on a statement of claim for debt collection
Q, there is a pending civil case no........ from 11/21/2011.. year, according to the claim of the LLP "Special Financial Company "Finance" (Hereinafter the Plaintiff) to gr. ............ ( Next is the Defendant) regarding debt collection under the bank loan agreement, we disagree with this claim on the following grounds: In accordance with the Bank Loan Agreement №......................... dated 11/30/20... (hereinafter referred to as the Loan Agreement), between Alliance Bank JSC (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) and gr. ............. (hereinafter referred to as the Borrower), a bank loan agreement was concluded, as a result of which the Bank provided the Borrower with a loan in the amount of 600,000 (six hundred thousand) tenge. On July 29, 2011, the Bank entered into a Factoring Agreement No. gr with Spektr-Collect LLP. ............, according to which. The Bank ceded to Spektr-Collect LLP (the assignee of the claim under the bank loan agreements of the CPC (a personal consumer lending product of Alliance Bank JSC, which operated until 2009), including under the Loan Agreement.
At the same time, in accordance with paragraph 2 of the section "Introduction" of the Factoring Agreement. The Bank has ceded to the assignee 100 (one hundred)% of the principal debt under the GAC bank loan agreements, 100 (one hundred)% of the accrued remuneration. 100 (one hundred)% of the accrued fees for maintaining debtors' bank accounts and 30 (thirty)% of the accrued penalties for late fulfillment of their obligations by debtors, since by the time the Factoring Agreement was signed, 70 (seventy) % of the accrued penalty was written off by the Bank (that is. The bank forgave the debtors most of the penalties) Subsequently, Spektr-Collect LLP was renamed SPEKTR Finance LLP, and an Additional Agreement was concluded between the Bank and the assignee. .............. from 26.09.20............ d. to the Factoring Agreement. In turn, SPECTRUM Finance LLP (the originator) signed a securitization agreement on October 24, 2011, according to which it assigned to the plaintiff the rights of claim previously acquired from the Bank under the Factoring Agreement under bank loan agreements, including the Loan Agreement. As of July 29, 2011, the Borrower's debt under the Loan Agreement amounted to 1,691,322 tenge, including partial payment, the total amount of debt amounted to 1,366,579. 90 tenge.
We do not agree with the above arguments of the Plaintiff, since the Plaintiff has already applied to the Forum Votum Arbitration Court located 050059, Almaty, md. on 22.07.2016. Samal-2, d. 58, block "G" office 56., +7 (727) 224-45-62., asforumvotum@gmail.com ., where on 09/02/2016 the Permanent Arbitration "Forum Votum" consisted of the arbitrator Yerkenov S.E., with the secretary of the arbitration session Balmukhambetov A.B., with the participation of the representative of the plaintiff LLP "Special Financial Company "Finance" Nefedov I.A., acting on the basis of Power of Attorney No. 113 dated April 18, 2016, reviewed the dispute over the claim of Special Financial Company Finance LLP against gr. ………… about the recovery of the debt amount and decided the claim - To satisfy the claims of the limited Liability Partnership "Special Financial Company "Finance" to gr. ............ on debt collection under a bank loan agreement, recovery of expenses for the payment of the arbitration fee, To recover from gr. ............ in favor of the plaintiff - LLP "Special Financial Company "Finance" the amount of debt in the amount of 1,596,322, To recover from gr. ............ in favor of the plaintiff - LLP "Special Financial Company "Finance" the amount of registration fees paid by the plaintiff and arbitration fees 37,926.
Sample Review of the recognition of DBZ as invalid due to the statute of limitations on the bank's Claim
The basis for the consideration of the claim in the Arbitration Court was an Agreement on May 08, 2015, an Agreement was concluded between the plaintiff and the Borrower's mother №............... on debt repayment, according to which, the defendant undertook to repay the above-mentioned debt in the amount of 1,691,322 tenge. In paragraph 2 of the above-mentioned Agreement, the parties have determined that all disputes, disagreements between the parties and claims of the parties arising from or in connection with the Agreement. including those related to its execution, violation, termination or invalidity, are subject to review and resolution in the Arbitration (Arbitration Court) "Forum Votum" in accordance with its Rules, at the location of the court in Almaty.
At the same time, the parties agreed that. that the decisions of the Forum Votum Arbitration Court are recognized by the parties as binding. After the Plaintiff received the writ of execution by the Private bailiff of the Zhambyl region Sarbashev Batyrkhan Kumykovich located at Taraz, mkr. Samal, (7), 12, 21 block, e-mail address: b.sarbashev@mail.ru . tel: 8 747 727 12 84, 8 778 472 1415, enforcement proceedings were initiated to recover the amount owed, after which the wages were burdened, which the Plaintiff does not agree on in his claim. Simply pointing out the alleged voluntary repayment of the debt by the Debtor in order not to apply the statute of limitations, while the Respected court the amount of partial payment of the pension was forcibly collected from wages while the court's decisions were canceled. Accordingly, the statute of limitations should be applied in this civil case.
Having disagreed with the above-mentioned decision, as at this court hearing, the defendant gr. ............., did not participate, never received
Attention!
Law and Law Law Law draws your attention to the fact that this document is basic and does not always meet the requirements of a particular situation. Our lawyers are ready to assist you in legal advice, drawing up any legal document suitable for your situation.
For more information, please contact a Lawyer / Attorney by phone: +7 (708) 971-78-58; +7 (700) 978 5755, +7 (700) 978 5085.
Attorney at Law Almaty Lawyer Legal Services Legal Advice Civil Criminal Administrative Cases Disputes Protection Arbitration Law Firm Kazakhstan Law Office Court Cases
